Both of them are manufactured and marketed by two of the leading companies who are known for making airless sprayers. Graco Ultra 395 and Titan’s Impact 440 originated from the State of Minnesota.

The designing of both the sprayers is made to hold minor projects for professional painters which typically entail small residential, small commercial, property management, and exterior in nature. Despite the fact that Titan paint sprayer parts are basically engineered on behalf of small jobs, neither sprayer withhold on distributing a quality sprayed finish, stability, or reliability.

Homeowners and DIYers must look at different tools meant for their spraying needs. Both these sprayers are overstatement for those types of projects and are not designed with novice users in mind.

Foremost differences

Both sprayers have taken the field (not in fact a clever remark as they can be worn for painting stripes on pavements and other surfaces), prepared themselves, and are ready to strike it out. Let’s see who comes out the champion.

A tie between both the sprayers regarding power and application rate

An ordinary assessment concerning the capacity of a sprayer to perform in the power of its motor and the maximum gallon per minute (GPM) application rate of both the sprayers’ features a 7/8 hp DC motor and can relate finishes at .54 GPM.

Some features related to impact 440

Cost of 440: Price is usually an imperative consideration unless you turn out to be made of money. Whereas the price battle is concerned, the Impact 440 comes out on peak. Maybe that’s why Titan promotes it as the top seller in its class.

Longest reach without moving the equipment: A nice characteristic of a proficient sprayer like these is the liveliness to pump the finish material long distances. A longer achieves means less equipment moves which consume into production time. The Impact 440 leaves behind the Graco 395, which has the capacity of delivering a maximum hose length of 300’ as compared to 200’.

Warranty of 440: Both sprayers approach with excellent warranties but, the 440 gets the point here with its 4-year exposure against defects in materials and workmanship compared to 3-years from Graco. The warranties of both the sprayers are quite close in nearly every other respect.

A feature of Graco 395: Design of the 395

Both corporations attach their special touches in an effort to make their products stand out from all the rest. However, the design point goes to the 395 for attention features that permit users to correct a problem in the field in minutes rather than hours or longer. The 395’s motor can be restored in under a minute, and both filters are easily reachable for clog clearing, especially the primary filter at the pump. On the other hand, Titan has designed the Impact 440 for ease of rebuilding, allowing its consumers to get extra miles, or either gallons in this case, from their equipment.

Graco Ultra 395 Stand Electric Airless Paint

Graco which is very well known for producing quality products is basically one of the original sprayer manufacturers. The merits and demerits related to Graco 395 are given below:

Merits

• In order to achieve a sprayers exceptional life, metal drive gears are attached with it.
• If we look at its literature, it is totally enclosed, includes a fan-cooled DC motor that keeps finish residue for longer life, and 2 times longer than competitive offers.
• It also entails outstanding application control at the pump and the gun for ideal results every time.

Demerits

• Not the least pricey of the pair.
• It does not achieve as far as the Titan, without moving equipment and finishes.

Titan Impact 440 Airless Skid Sprayers

Titan may be newer to the market but they have introduced a lot of innovations and push their product designs to meet every need a professional painter might have.

Merits

• Outstanding on-pump controls and indicators that are designed for easy setup, operation, and monitoring.
• Can progress the finish up to 300’ from the pump
• It also has an AutoOil feature in order to keep packing lubricated

Demerits

• It is not as easy to get back into operation as the Graco 395.
• This sprayer is more difficult to clean and clear clogs

Users review

When we talk about the quality of the sprayers finish applied, the clients of both sprayers admire the results produced. Airless sprayers present an amazing degree of power and uniformity of finish application. If it is properly adjusted, one coat is often all that is needed to complete a job. Fewer coats acquire actually fewer hours, fewer gallons sprayed, and more profit. If you are playing role of a contractor, what’s not to like?

Reliability and durability

The features that appear are reliability and durability as well. In the toning game, you want tools you can rely on to perform every time. Both sprayers are trustworthy, and each has a strong design. As we mentioned, the 395 has a positive aspect in clearing clogs and replacing major components quickly.

When it comes to negative aspects, the comments are bare. Cleaning complaints come up, but that is to be predictable when working with equipment that sprays finishes. If you don’t clean them right, they are not going to perform. A couple of other concerns were found that can be classified as manufacturing or consumer related. In each case, the issue was handled to the user’s approval.

Conclusion

At the end of the day, we have to confer the acknowledgement to the Titan Impact 440. As it has better warranty, better price, longer working distance. All merge into a superior choice for contractors in need of a sprayer to handle smaller projects.